Most of the people by this point know either subconsciously or intentionally the key reasons for why CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS TELEVISION STUDIOS, and Fox News regulars act like a team of preppy high school girls. A few briefly list 4 common reasons before moving on to the underlying reason. dr. sergey anokhin
1) The nature of their work as charming and believable presenters details rather than experts. It can be key to mention that the separation between twenty four hour cable networks and brief “serious” 6 PM HOURS broadcasts on basic wire is disappearing. It used to be that the evening news audience market was numerically dominated by the group of seniors depression era females. This kind of explained the need for senior citizens like Serta Rather who was ideal marriage material for the widowed viewers and shipped the authority of a tiny town doctor. To this day a doctor is shown by polls as the utmost respected income laborer whose judgment is considered the most truthful (it makes doctors natural business lead characters in TV theatre series and movies). Nevertheless this demographic is perishing off and being changed by baby boomer women (greater female life course always tilts corporate little profit seeking) who value Katie Couric’s professional achievements and ability to look great at her age.
2) Support by biggest press corporations of Reagan’s work to reduce funding for department of education (either through cheerleading it or tacit support from silence). 40 year olds observing this news on TV today were directly damaged by the panoramic reduction in quality of schooling. Television set and newspapers thus have to use less big words and their copy writers are increasingly relying on baby speak, puns, and outright prepackaged talking items (Gretchen Carlson playing not smart to keep her job is one extreme example of this). Shorter attention span is not the source but the social sign. This directly feeds into 3)
3) MSM reacting to an Australian tabloid oligarch’s invasion of Combined States with headlong hurry towards turning news into entertainment. Of course this may have happened even without the accelerating influence of Rupert Murdoch’s News Organization conglomerate. The aging of current TV demographic is long lasting since mostly those remain who are powerless to master the use of sites two way transmitting medium. Since the audience is increasingly represented by rural seniors who were failed by the training drives in the 50s and 60s, the amplification, rise of circus style hysterical entertainment as seen on the radio is inescapable for the short term. Murdoch’s influence must again be mentioned however. Newstartainment ( trademarked =] ) saw a publicly obvious deepening break up between internationalist media oligarchs (who encourage globalization since USA is not essential to their base of operations) and nationalist press oligarchs who use their media asset influence to help out USA structured heavy industry. NBC Common can be said to be a good example of a nationalist oligarch mouthpiece since it is owned by Standard Electric (which is dependent on selling real concrete items like engine parts to US military and government organs). News
Firm of course is quite a bit less reliant on the health of United States military-industrial complex so its possessions like Fox News can be extra irresponsible with their newstartainment. From the financial perspective it is best strategy for GE’s bottom series to compliment nationalist Democratic get together wing of the oligarchy (since better educated/healthier cowboys allow US based corps to raised compete abroad). That is why MSNBC leans towards democratic millionaires and their businesses. The simple fact that Fox News was emulated points less to the success of the claims than to a transition of formerly US tied corporations towards a more global status. To get more information on who the top 10 owners of media clusters are, is a convenient chart (warning: This is certainly from 2002 and the industry got more consolidated and monolithic since then. Utilize it to get the thrust of the idea).
4) Losing advertisement earnings to the internet since tv set news (and TV programming in general) would not live up to its promise of raising human consciousness as envisioned by the first head of the FCC. The internet serves as a type of American glasnost while tv set is a way to sell condition propaganda and mass produced TV drama garbage at home and abroad. That is certainly easily recognizable. Getting young people’s trust back (to keep going permanent as old people die) is now nearly impossible and the road of least amount of resistance is to intensify the circus. Some teenagers watch the news and MTV just to laugh at how terrible it is (that is still a mild boost to advertisement revenue). News “anchors” themselves do not come into contact with relevant information much since their sites have actively cut recruiting of journalistic investigative ability. Since it is more affordable to investigate second hand information with talking heads than hire sufficient numbers of understimulated human explorers (and pay for their routes, hotel accommodation, security, etc), news anchors come much less into real contact with knowledgeable experts. Ridiculous cowards like Wolf Blitzer for example, obtaining hits to their self esteem all the from interaction with resident stay at home talking heads compared to old school journalist data fiends like Michael Ware. To get fair, as Monk News anchors show, there is a lot of self censorship and dumbing down to remain on the task.